XPost: alt.checkmate, alt.usenet.kooks, talk.politics.guns
From: root@127.0.0.1

https://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/deadly-doctor/

Q: Does Ezekiel Emanuel advocate sacrificing medical care for senior
citizens and disabled youths for the good of society?

A: No. Critics of health care legislation are distorting the meaning of Emanuel’s academic writings on medical ethics. And Emanuel tells us, "I
am not advocating this."


FULL QUESTION

Is it true that Dr. Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Rahm Emanuel’s older brother and health adviser to President Obama, has advocated "the elderly with
dementia and the young who have neurological disorders should be
sacrificed for the common good"?

FULL ANSWER

The introduction of Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, head of the Department of
Bioethics at The Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health,
into the health care reform debate came with an opinion piece written by
Betsy McCaughey and published in the New York Post on July 24. Dr.
Emanuel is also a health care policy adviser for the Office of Management
and Budget and brother of President Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel.

McCaughey, a former New York lieutenant governor, claimed that Ezekiel
Emanuel advocated that "medical care should be reserved for the non-
disabled, not given to those ‘who are irreversibly prevented from being
or becoming participating citizens.’ " She interprets his words to mean: "Don’t give much care to a grandmother with Parkinson’s or a child with cerebral palsy."

Dr. Emanuel strenuously objects to this interpretation. "This is
certainly untrue and a distortion of my record," he told FactCheck.org in
a telephone interview. He said that his academic work is being taken
completely out of context.

We agree that Emanuel’s meaning is being twisted. In one article, he was talking about a philosophical trend, and in another, he was writing about
how to make the most ethical choices when forced to choose which patients
get organ transplants or vaccines when supplies are limited.

What Emanuel Really Said

McCaughey cites an article Emanuel wrote nearly 15 years ago in the
Hastings Center Report, a journal devoted to discussion of ethical issues
in medicine. There Emanuel discusses possible philosophical
justifications to "distinguish basic from discretionary health care
services." Emanuel argued that thinkers on both the left and right were beginning to converge on a single answer when it comes to allocating
medical resources. Here’s the quote in full context:

Emanuel, Hastings Center Report, 1996: Communitarians endorse civic republicanism and a growing number of liberals endorse some version of deliberative democracy. … This civic republican or deliberative
democratic conception of the good provides both procedural and
substantive insights for developing a just allocation of health care
resources. … Substantively, it suggests services that promote the continuation of the polity – those that ensure healthy future
generations, ensure development of practical reasoning skills, and ensure
full and active participation by citizens in public deliberations – are
to be socially guaranteed as basic. Conversely, services provided to individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming
participating citizens are not basic and should not be guaranteed. An
obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with
dementia. A less obvious example is guaranteeing neuropsychological
services to ensure children with learning disabilities can read and learn
to reason.

Emanuel conceded that the article is "pretty abstract" and may be
difficult to follow for those who are not academics, but he said that one should not then "take two sentences out of context."

"This is clearly not written in my own voice," he said. "I am not
advocating this."

We’ll leave it to you to determine the merits of Emanuel’s philosophical observations. But the context makes it clear that Emanuel is describing
the implications of a particular philosophical trend, not offering a
policy prescription.

We’ll also note that Emanuel’s article actually said that children with learning disabilities should get medical help to ensure that they "can
read and learn to reason." We’re not sure how McCaughey interpreted this
to mean that services should be withheld from "a child with cerebral
palsy."

McCaughey also pushes the idea that Emanuel would want to ration care for seniors by quoting from a January 2009 article that Emanuel coauthored in
The Lancet journal. Here, McCaughey says, he "explicitly defends
discrimination against older patients."

What Emanuel and his two coauthors were actually writing about was how to decide which patients are to receive organ transplants, vaccines or other
"very scarce medical interventions" when there are not enough to go
around. The three authors advocated favoring younger patients over older patients as part of a "complete lives" decision-making system aimed at
saving the most years of life using the available resources. Age would be
only one factor, however. Also weighing in the "complete lives" system
would be such factors as a patient’s likelihood of full recovery
(prognosis) and the use of a lottery when deciding between two "roughly
equal" patients.

The authors disputed the idea that this system discriminates against
older people in the way that favoring one race or one sex over another
would discriminate. "Treating 65-year-olds differently because of
stereotypes or falsehoods would be ageist; treating them differently
because they have already had more life-years is not." The authors stated
that the complete lives system "empowers us to decide fairly whom to save
when genuine scarcity makes saving everyone impossible."

Emanuel told us that allocating health care services when there is an
"absolute scarcity" is "one of the hardest decisions that a physician has
to make." He said that he and his fellow authors were pondering "the most ethically coherent way to do that."

There She Goes Again

McCaughey also claims in her article that "presidential appointees" will
be deciding "your care" and that Dr. Emanuel should "never be trusted
with that power." She’s echoing an earlier false claim about health care rationing that she first trotted out back in February. It’s no more true
this time around. A version of the health care bill in Congress, H.R.
3200, does mention creating a comparative effectiveness research center
(and a comparative effectiveness commission to oversee the center) to
conduct research into how sickness "can most effectively and
appropriately be prevented, diagnosed, treated, and managed clinically."
A summary of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee
bill also mentions the establishment of a center for similar purposes.
But the research wouldn’t be used to dictate health care coverage. The
House version of the bill specifically states that the information can’t
be used to mandate any policies for either private insurance coverage or
for government health insurance:

H.R. 3200: Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit the
Commission or the Center to mandate coverage, reimbursement, or other
policies for any public or private payer.

So whether or not one might choose to trust Dr. Emanuel with the power to decide "your care," the fact is that no such power is being proposed in
the legislation now being considered.

Note: For more on bioethics, please see our FactCheck Wire post, "When Philosophy Meets Politics."

– D’Angelo Gore

Sources
McCaughey, Betsy. "Deadly Doctors." New York Post. 24 Jul 2009.

Emanuel, Ezekiel. "Where Civic Republicanism and Deliberative Democracy
Meet." The Hastings Center Report. Vol. 26, No. 6. (1996).

Persad, Govind, et al. "Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions." The Lancet. Vol. 373, No. 9661 (2009).

Tapper, Jake. "When Academic Words Become Political Ammunition." ABC News Political Punch Blog. 28 Jul 2009.

Tapper, Jake. "Zeke Emanuel on Sarah Palin’s Accusation of ‘Death Panels’: ‘It’s An Absolute Outrage’." ABC News Political Punch Blog. 13 Aug 2009.

Scherer, Michael. "Ezekiel Emanuel, Obama’s ‘Deadly Doctor,’ Strikes Back." Time.com. 12 Aug 2009.

Emanuel, Ezekiel. Interview with FactCheck.org. 13 Aug 2009.

--
[THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECK® VALIDATION]

THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA

"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this
seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer,
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized
country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)

"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy
willow fan)

-

"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor

-

"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's
description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of
social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which
uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement
which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." -
Jason Rhode

-

"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." -
"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white
males are violent in Message-ID:
<MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March
2016

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)