• =?ISO-8859-1?B?IklU lM=?= YOUR FUNERAL": New York Post Shreds "Swamp Mi

    From Ubiquitous@1:229/2 to All on Friday, December 20, 2019 21:05:10
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.impeach
    XPost: alt.politics.usa
    From: weberm@polaris.net

    The New York Post slammed Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in its
    Thursday cover and an op-ed published from columnist Michael Goodwin
    over the Democrats’ purely partisan impeachment of President Donald
    Trump.

    The cover features a picture of Pelosi dressed in black for impeachment
    and states: “IT’S YOUR FUNERAL: Swamp mistress Pelosi dresses in black
    for historic vote.”

    https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1207615329033170947/photo/1

    The Post’s cover and the op-ed from Goodwin come in response to
    Democrats, for the first time in U.S. history, impeaching a president
    along strictly partisan lines, as only Democrats voted for the
    impeachment and all Republicans voted against it, with a multiple
    Democrats siding with the Republicans. One independent member sided
    with the Democrats.

    The Post noted that Pelosi had publicly and privately fought off
    impeachment for months as the far-left faction of her party, led by
    socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), aggressively demanded impeachment.

    Pelosi told The Washington Post in March, “Impeachment is so divisive
    to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and
    overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that
    path.”

    Pelosi told CNN in June, “I don’t think there’s anything more divisive
    we can do than to impeach a president of the United States, and so you
    have to handle it with great care. It has to be about the truth and the
    facts to take you to whatever decision has to be there. It should by no
    means be done politically.”

    Goodwin wrote in his op-ed:

    [B]y last Sept. 24, with the 2020 election fast approaching
    and her icy relationship with Trump now a bonfire, Pelosi
    suddenly flip-flopped on impeachment. Her ostensible reason
    centered on the unverified claims of an anonymous whistleblower
    regarding Trump’s phone call with the president of Ukraine.
    The call, she was assured by the media and Rep. Adam Schiff,
    would amount to a smoking gun. …

    … Twenty-four hours later, Trump released the transcript of
    the Ukraine call and it was benign in comparison to her
    inflammatory accusation. If only Pelosi had waited another
    day.

    But it was too late. Confident that she had the votes now
    that most if not all the 2018 winners would be with her, she
    erased her previous red lines about bipartisanship, took the
    plunge — and plunged America into a nightmare that continues.

    Goodwin went on to write that “the damage” from Pelos’s actions to
    America “is real.”

    Goodwin was not alone in his analysis as others, including The New York
    Post’s editorial board, who noted what Alexander Hamilton wrote in
    Federalist 65. Hamilton wrote:

    A well-constituted court for the trial of impeachments is an
    object not more to be desired than difficult to be obtained
    in a government wholly elective. The subjects of its
    jurisdiction are those offenses which proceed from the
    misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse
    or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which
    may with peculiar propriety be denominated POLITICAL, as they
    relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society
    itself. The prosecution of them, for this reason, will seldom
    fail to agitate the passions of the whole community, and to
    divide it into parties more or less friendly or inimical to
    the accused. In many cases it will connect itself with the
    pre-existing factions, and will enlist all their animosities,
    partialities, influence, and interest on one side or on the
    other; and in such cases there will always be the greatest
    danger that the decision will be regulated more by the
    comparative strength of parties, than by the real
    demonstrations of innocence or guilt.


    --
    "We need to impeach the President to find out what crime he committed."
    -- Nancy Pelosi

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)