• Trump Sums Up Democrats' Three-Year Impeachment Campaign Against Him In

    From Ubiquitous@1:229/2 to All on Monday, December 23, 2019 21:05:11
    XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump
    XPost: alt.politics.usa
    From: weberm@polaris.net

    President Trump agrees with Democrats that the current impeachment
    scandal is “bigger than Watergate” — he just disagrees on what exactly
    the scandal is and who’s the true culprit.

    On Sunday, Trump tweeted out a summary of what he says has actually
    been going on for the last three years, resulting in two articles of impeachment against him, passed last week without a single Republican
    vote.

    It started with the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton campaign-funded Steele dossier, which Justice Department Inspector
    General Michael Horowitz’s investigation on FISA abuse found played “a
    central and essential role” in the origins of the FBI’s surveillance of
    the Trump campaign, said Trump. The Democrats’ smear effort was then
    aided and abetted by a “corrupt media.”

    “The Democrats and Crooked Hillary paid for & provided a Fake Dossier,
    with phony information gotten from foreign sources, pushed it to the
    corrupt media & Dirty Cops, & have now been caught,” he tweeted. “They
    spied on my campaign, then tried to cover it up — Just Like Watergate,
    but bigger!”

    “We determined that the Crossfire Hurricane team’s receipt of Steele’s
    election reporting on September 19, 2016 played a central and essential
    role in the FBI’s and Department’s decision to seek the FISA order,”
    Horowitz’s long-anticipated report concludes. A fourth element of the
    initial FISA application, which claimed Trump campaign adviser Carter
    Page coordinated with Russia on behalf of the campaign, “relied
    entirely on” information from the discredited dossier.

    Trump’s “bigger than Watergate” tweet comes a few days after he
    trollingly suggested impeaching Pelosi for imposing her own “quid pro
    quo” on the Senate. “Nancy Pelosi is looking for a Quid Pro Quo with
    the Senate. Why aren’t we Impeaching her?” Trump tweeted Friday.

    Nancy Pelosi is looking for a Quid Pro Quo with the Senate.
    Why aren’t we Impeaching her?
    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 20, 2019

    Trump’s “quid pro quo” comment is a reference to Pelosi delaying
    sending the articles of impeachment to the Republican-controlled Senate
    in an attempt to force Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to
    capitulate to the Democrats’ demands on how to conduct the impeachment
    trial in the name of “fairness.”

    “So far we haven’t seen anything that looks fair to us,” Pelosi told
    reporters following the partisan impeachment vote. “That would’ve been
    our intention, but we’ll see what happens over there.”

    Trump has had a lot to say about the Democrats’ delay tactic as well.
    “Pelosi gives us the most unfair trial in the history of the U.S.
    Congress, and now she is crying for fairness in the Senate, and
    breaking all rules while doing so,” he tweeted Monday morning. “She
    lost Congress once, she will do it again!”

    Many analysts have described Pelosi’s gambit as politically precarious,
    as it draws out an increasingly unpopular impeachment and diminishes
    Democrats’ insistence that Trump poses a serious “threat” to the
    country. As The Daily Wire noted, New York Times columnist David
    Brooks, a frequent critic of Trump, told “PBS NewsHour” that Pelosi was
    engaged in a “very risky” political ploy.

    “As Mitch McConnell said, ‘Why is withholding something I don’t want to
    do, why is that leverage?'” Brooks said. “And so it was always going to
    be a reality that, once the House voted to impeach, they were going to
    lose control of the process.”

    Brooks also argued, like many others, that Republicans’ most convincing
    case against impeachment centers on the very nature of the accusation
    against Trump, his alleged “quid pro quo” trading military aid for a
    political favor, which simply “doesn’t rise to the level of
    impeachment.”

    Republicans can make the case that “if we set this standard, pretty
    much every president is going to come under impeachment for this,”
    Brooks suggested. “They could go back in history, Iran-Contra, and they
    could say, look, every president messes up in some very serious way —
    almost every president, many presidents. And if we set this standard,
    we will be just impeaching people for years and years.”

    --
    "We need to impeach the President to find out what crime he committed."
    - Nancy Pelosi

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)