• Re: Paterson bank records.

    From Craig Cockburn@1:229/2 to Murchadh on Wednesday, August 04, 2021 14:19:24
    From: craig@siliconglen.com

    On Sunday, 21 March 2004 at 19:19:51 UTC, Murchadh wrote:
    On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:49:00 +0100, suzieflame
    <Suzie...@yachtmail.com> wrote:
    How about a conviction for it, revealed by his former girlfriend and >admitted to by Paterson himself?
    You're a pathological liar. I have never admitted such a thing because
    it has never happened; something you're well aware of but are unable
    to let go as it fulfills a desperate need inside you to punish and
    destroy those whom you perceive as being happier than you are. You
    need psychiatric treatment and you need it badly.
    If you were to say that the lady attacked me from behind and hit me so
    hard on the head with an blunt instrument that it disintegrated, I
    would agree. Both the sheriff and a deputy sheriff expressed amazement
    that I had not been knocked out. Thick Scottish skull.
    She also hit me with a club and permanently damaged my right elbow. It
    aches at this moment as I type.
    She also sat with a loaded, cocked gun in her hand and told me how she
    was debating about which part of my body to shoot me in. She was
    finally dissuaded by my calming voice and my quiet reminder that she
    would be executed if she killed me, given the surrounding evidence.
    However, I think the most telling point is that she was arrested and
    taken to jail once the police arrived. Her attempts to influence the
    Sheriff by trying to ally him with her as a former policewoman in
    Florida went nowhere after a phonecall for a reference resulted in
    nothing I'd want on my record.
    As far as knives were concerned, after questioning me and asking me to
    prove my points, the Sheriff accepted that that no knife was involved.
    He did take away the lady's loaded pistols at my request.
    You are invited to produce proof that I have any convictions anywhere
    in the world and that there are warrants of any kind anywhere in the
    world for my arrest, with the exception of China (political stuff).
    You will be unable to do so because you are a liar and a psychopath.
    Indeed, the sheriff himself helped me pack and offered to drive me
    wherever I needed to go. Hardly the treatment accorded to a woman
    beater, murderer, contract killer, etc.

    The US authorities asked me to return from Canada to give evidence
    against the lady; a request repeated to me by her mother who wanted
    her locked up before she killed someone. I declined because no mention
    was made of treating her problems, only of hard time for up to 15
    years. If she kills someone else, then she'll be lethally injected and
    that will be the end of that.
    A policewoman trained in dealing with psychopathic killers told me
    that the next man she pulled this stunt on - she had at least one
    other victim in her past according to her mother (Quote: "You weren't
    the first") and she once told me a story of clubbing a man with a
    rifle butt and pistol-whipping him - would almost certainly be
    murdered. The sheriff told me the same thing, and said he thought I
    should leave while I could as he'd sooner have a drink with me in a
    year or two than identify me in the local morgue. He got no argument
    from me opn that point.
    I see the other thread you started here is entirely concerned with
    your one-time friends slagging you. Looks like you've hit bottom.
    Out of curiosity, why are you privy to such information?

    It's public information, if you know were to look and how to ask.
    This is of course nonsense, other than looking up old posts.
    Suzieflame has no more access to confidential information than any
    other ordinary citizen, but she inflates her status to include all
    sorts of secret contacts among people in privileged places, which most ordinary people see through right away.
    I feel sorry for her and grateful that I don't have her problems. She
    accuses me of wanting to kill her, but I don't need her death to
    validate myself as a human being. Nor indeed does any rational human.
    She does, except that she doesn't kill physically, but with lies and innuendo. It's clear that you are reasonably well-balanced as you are
    neither fooled nor impresed by her wild claims and fantasy life.
    And more to the point, if you
    are somehow by law granted access to information protected by The Data >>Protection Act, you *must* be breaking the law by posting it all over >>Usenet.

    LOL - how very insular.
    You're not insular - that's Suzieflame trying to regain her authority
    over you - but like most people, unaware of how little protection is
    actually available for anyting in real life unless you are lucky
    enough to be in the right place at the right time.
    Suzieflame's "edge" is that despite her inability to stop herself from stalking and threatening people which of course are criminal acts, no
    law enforcement agency is prepared to spend time and resources
    tracking her down because the damage she actually causes is miniscule compared to the cost of catching and prosecuting her, unless she
    targets an undercover cop. Think of her as a form of pubic lice rather
    than Ebola and you get the idea.
    I'm not just referring to this thread, but to just about every thread you >>get involved in.

    I would like you to condemn Micahel Paterson for his laughable threats
    to denounce some anonymous Usenet entity as a child molester. If you
    don't we'll all know your true colors.
    She's quite right - she's an anonymous Usenet entity and that means
    that you can libel her and destroy her reputation as much as you want
    because in law she is not a real person whom people can point at and
    say, "I despise her because of what Clyde B. wrote". She's a Marge
    Simpson in law; a cartoon character. In this case, a rather sad joke.
    I very much doubt that she would ever try to claim damages as her act
    depends on anonymity. However she bluffs well; she libels you but you
    are reluctant to libel her because she sems to have authoruity on her
    side. She has none; she is a con artist; as dishonest and deceptive as
    any politician or Enron employee.
    Nothing she says can be trusted; anything you say about her is
    undeniable, except by her, whom no one believes, and because she
    cannot produce proof to the contrary without revealing her identity,
    at which point the nearest former victim slits her throat.
    I assume she's in her forties and getting a bit gross-looking as a
    life of acid bitterness will have marked her face irreparably by now
    unless she is genuinely insane, in which case she will have a haughty imperious face and be someone who loses her temper in an instant for
    no good reason.
    Anyway, you have complete control over her as long as she responds to
    your posts. That's easy to arrange; just tell her some dirt "in
    confidence" about yourself and she'll be unable to let it go, like a
    jackal tearing at an antelope fawn.
    You can post anything you want about her; there's nothing she can do
    except keep repeating the same old dreary lines that you fed her.
    Her only strength was being backed by her pals in alt,flame, but that
    sems to be waning as people tire of seeing the same old routine
    repeated endlessly.
    I fully intend to prosecute my war on wastrels thorugh other means
    however, and advise you to avail yourself of a decent killfile.
    As you can see, she's genuinely out of control and actually believes
    that God/cocaine has given her a mission to reform the world, in this
    case represented by Usenet. This is a standard delusion, usually
    religious, but here based on the same instincts that made Anna Pauker,
    former Prison Minister in Hungary, insert glass rods into prisoners'
    penises and then smash them with a hammer.
    Suzieflame's ace card is that most people will not descend to the
    level of invective and venom that she habitually uses. The technique
    is commonplace and much beloved of the secret police; to deafen you
    with accusations of serious crimes you haven't committed so you'll
    confess to the less serious crimes you have committed.
    In my case, the information that she keeps trotting out has little
    effect on me. To be bothered by such matters, it has to be true and
    you have to care what other people think. With a few exceptions I
    don't give a shit what anyone thinks, as in my career experience, most
    people are cowardly liars who would betray their best friend to the
    Gestapo if they believed it would save their own skin.
    Murchadh


    https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/vancouversun/obituary.aspx?n=michael-roberton-paterson&pid=143299521

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)