• The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr." (1/3)

    From Ronny Koch@1:229/2 to All on Wednesday, January 22, 2025 04:35:37
    XPost: alt.government.employees, alt.society.labor-unions, alt.thought.southern XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities
    From: rkoch@banmlkday.com

    WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things
    that they did was to confiscate all the privately-held weapons,
    to deny the people the physical ability to resist tyranny. But
    even more insidious than the theft of the people's weapons was
    the theft of their history. Official Communist "historians"
    rewrote history to fit the current party line. In many
    countries, revered national heroes were excised from the history
    books, or their real deeds were distorted to fit Communist
    ideology, and Communist killers and criminals were converted
    into official "saints." Holidays were declared in honor of the
    beasts who murdered countless nations.

    Did you know that much the same process has occurred right here
    in America?

    Every January, the media go into a kind of almost spastic frenzy
    of adulation for the so-called "Reverend Doctor Martin Luther
    King, Jr." King has even had a national holiday declared in his
    honor, an honor accorded to no other American, not Washington,
    not Jefferson, not Lincoln. (Washington and Lincoln no longer
    have holidays -- they share the generic-sounding "President's
    Day.") A liberal judge has sealed the FBI files on King until
    the year 2027. What are they hiding? Let's take a look at this
    modern-day plastic god.

    Born in 1929, King was the son of a Black preacher known at the
    time only as "Daddy King." "Daddy King" named his son Michael.
    In 1935, "Daddy King" had an inspiration to name himself after
    the Protestant reformer Martin Luther. He declared to his
    congregation that henceforth they were to refer to him as
    "Martin Luther King" and to his son as "Martin Luther King, Jr."
    None of this name changing was ever legalized in court. "Daddy"
    King's son's real name is to this day Michael King.

    King's Brazen Cheating

    We read in Michael Hoffman's "Holiday for a Cheater":

    The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the
    Ebenezer Baptist Church, was plagiarized from a homily by
    Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson Fosdick entitled "Life is
    What You Make It," according to the testimony of King's best
    friend of that time, Reverend Larry H. Williams.

    The first book that King wrote, "Stride Toward Freedom, - -was
    plagiarized from numerous sources, all unattributed, according
    to documentation recently assembled by sympathetic King scholars
    Keith D. Miller, Ira G. Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow.

    And no less an authoritative source than the four senior editors
    of "The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.- - (an official
    publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent
    Social Change, Inc., whose staff includes King's widow Coretta),
    stated of King's writings at both Boston University and Crozer
    Theological Seminary: "Judged retroactively by the standards of
    academic scholarship, [his writings] are tragically flawed by
    numerous instances of plagiarism.... Appropriated passages are
    particularly evident in his writings in his major field of
    graduate study, systematic theology."

    King's essay, "The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding
    God," written at Crozer, pirated passages from the work of
    theologian Edgar S. Brightman, author of "The Finding of God."

    Another of King's theses, "Contemporary Continental Theology,"
    written shortly after he entered Boston University, was largely
    stolen from a book by Walter Marshall Horton.

    King's doctoral dissertation, "A Comparison of the Conceptions
    of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman,"
    for which he was awarded a PhD in theology, contains more than
    fifty complete sentences plagiarized from the PhD dissertation
    of Dr. Jack Boozer, "The Place of Reason in Paul Tillich's
    Concept of God."

    According to "The Martin Luther King Papers", in King's
    dissertation "only 49 per cent of sentences in the section on
    Tillich contain five or more words that were King's own...."!

    In "The Journal of American History", June 1991, page 87, David
    J. Garrow, a leftist academic who is sympathetic to King, says
    that King's wife, Coretta Scott King, who also served as his
    secretary, was an accomplice in his repeated cheating. ("King's
    Plagiarism: Imitation, Insecurity and Transformation," The
    Journal of American History, June 1991, p. 87)


    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)