[continued from previous message]

Reading Garrow's article, one is led to the inescapable
conclusion that King cheated because he had chosen for himself a
political role in which a PhD would be useful, and, lacking the
intellectual ability to obtain the title fairly, went after it
by any means necessary. Why, then, one might ask, did the
professors at Crozer Theological Seminary and Boston University
grant him passing grades and a PhD? Garrow states on page 89:
"King's academic compositions, especially at Boston University,
were almost without exception little more than summary
descriptions... and comparisons of other's writings.
Nonetheless, the papers almost always received desirable letter
grades, strongly suggesting that King's professors did not
expect more...." The editors of "The Martin Luther King Jr.
Papers" state that "...the failure of King's teachers to notice
his pattern of textual appropriation is somewhat remarkable...."

But researcher Michael Hoffman tells us "...actually the
malfeasance of the professors is not at all remarkable. King was
politically correct, he was Black, and he had ambitions. The
leftist [professors were] happy to award a doctorate to such a
candidate no matter how much fraud was involved. Nor is it any
wonder that it has taken forty years for the truth about King's
record of nearly constant intellectual piracy to be made public."

Supposed scholars, who in reality shared King's vision of a
racially mixed and Marxist America, purposely covered up his
cheating for decades. The cover-up still continues. From the
"New York Times" of October 11, 1991, page 15, we learn that on
October 10th of that year, a committee of researchers at Boston
University admitted that, "There is no question but that Dr.
King plagiarized in the dissertation." However, despite its
finding, the committee said that "No thought should be given to
the revocation of Dr. King's doctoral degree," an action the
panel said "would serve no purpose."

No purpose, indeed! Justice demands that, in light of his
willful fraud as a student, the "reverend" and the "doctor"
should be removed from King's name.

Communist Beliefs and Connections

Well friends, he is not a legitimate reverend, he is not a bona
fide PhD, and his name isn't really "Martin Luther King, Jr."
What's left? Just a sexual degenerate, an America-hating
Communist, and a criminal betrayer of even the interests of his
own people.


On Labor Day, 1957, a special meeting was attended by Martin
Luther King and four others at a strange institution called the
Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee. The Highlander
Folk School was a Communist front, having been founded by Myles
Horton (Communist Party organizer for Tennessee) and Don West
(Communist Party organizer for North Carolina). The leaders of
this meeting with King were the aforementioned Horton and West,
along with Abner Berry and James Dumbrowski, all open and
acknowledged members of the Communist Party, USA. The agenda of
the meeting was a plan to tour the Southern states to initiate
demonstrations and riots.

From 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King's associate, advisor, and
personal secretary was one Bayard Rustin. In 1936 Rustin joined
the Young Communist League at New York City College. Convicted
of draft-dodging, he went to prison for two years in 1944. On
January 23, 1953 the "Los Angeles Times" reported his conviction
and sentencing to jail for 60 days for lewd vagrancy and
homosexual perversion. Rustin attended the 16th Convention of
the Communist Party, USA in February, 1957. One month later, he
and King founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference,
or SCLC for short. The president of the SCLC was Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr. The vice-president of the SCLC was the Reverend
Fred Shuttlesworth, who was also the president of an identified
Communist front known as the Southern Conference Educational
Fund, an organization whose field director, a Mr. Carl Braden,
was simultaneously a national sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba
Committee, of which you may have heard. The program director of
the SCLC was the Reverend Andrew Young, in more recent years
Jimmy Carter's ambassador to the UN and mayor of Atlanta. Young,
by the way, was trained at the Highlander Folk School,
previously mentioned.

Soon after returning from a trip to Moscow in 1958, Rustin
organized the first of King's famous marches on Washington. The
official organ of the Communist Party, "The Worker,- - openly
declared the march to be a Communist project. Although he left
King's employ as secretary in 1961, Rustin was called upon by
King to be second in command of the much larger march on
Washington which took place on August 28, 1963.

Bayard Rustin's replacement in 1961 as secretary and advisor to
King was Jack O'Dell, also known as Hunter Pitts O'Dell.
According to official records, in 1962 Jack O'Dell was a member
of the National Committee of the Communist Party, USA. He had
been listed as a Communist Party member as early as 1956. O'Dell
was also given the job of acting executive director for SCLC
activities for the entire Southeast, according to the St. Louis
"Globe-Democrat - -of October 26, 1962. At that time, there were
still some patriots in the press corps, and word of O'Dell's
party membership became known.

What did King do? Shortly after the negative news reports, King
fired O'Dell with much fanfare. And he then, without the
fanfare, "immediately hired him again- - as director of the New
York office of the SCLC, as confirmed by the "Richmond News-
Leader - -of September 27, 1963. In 1963 a Black man from
Monroe, North Carolina named Robert Williams made a trip to
Peking, China. Exactly 20 days before King's 1963 march on
Washington, Williams successfully urged Mao Tse-Tung to speak
out on behalf of King's movement. Mr. Williams was also around
this time maintaining his primary residence in Cuba, from which
he made regular broadcasts to the southern US, three times a
week, from high-power AM transmitters in Havana under the title
"Radio Free Dixie." In these broadcasts, he urged violent
attacks by Blacks against White Americans.

During this period, Williams wrote a book entitled "Negroes With
Guns." The writer of the foreword for this book? None other than
Martin Luther King, Jr. It is also interesting to note that the
editors and publishers of this book were to a man all supporters
of the infamous Fair Play for Cuba Committee.

According to King's biographer and sympathizer David J. Garrow,
"King privately described himself as a Marxist." In his 1981
book, "The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.", Garrow quotes King
as saying in SCLC staff meetings, "...we have moved into a new
era, which must be an era of revolution.... The whole structure
of American life must be changed.... We are engaged in the class
struggle."

Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as King's behind-the-scenes "handler." Levison, who had for years been in
charge of the secret funnelling of Soviet funds to the Communist
Party, USA, was King's mentor and was actually the brains behind
many of King's more successful ploys. It was Levison who edited
King's book, "Stride Toward Freedom." It was Levison who
arranged for a publisher. Levison even prepared King's income
tax returns! It was Levison who really controlled the fund-
raising and agitation activities of the SCLC. Levison wrote many

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)