• Britain doesn't just glorify its violent past: it gets high on it

    From Dr. Jai Maharaj@1:229/2 to All on Monday, December 17, 2018 20:00:10
    XPost: soc.culture.indian, alt.fan.jai-maharaj, soc.culture.british
    XPost: alt.usage.english, alt.english.usage, soc.culture.usa
    XPost: alt.security.terrorism, alt.politics, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: soc.culture.india
    From: alt.fan.jai-maharaj@googlegroups.com

    Britain doesn't just glorify its violent past: it gets high
    on it

    The defensive, patriotic narrative of empire has become a
    drug. Like all addicts, those hooked on it cannot stomach
    critique

    By Afua Hirsch
    The Guardian, theguardian.com
    Thursday, May 31, 2018

    'One respected academic was advised that, if he pursued the
    study of Churchill's responsibility for the Bengal famine,
    his career would be compromised.' Photograph: PA

    It feels like I live in the middle of a culture war. On one
    side is a kind of state-sponsored amnesia. It's pervasive.
    It's an Oscar-winning movie perpetuating the idea that
    Winston Churchill stood alone, at the Darkest Hour, as Nazi
    fascism encroached, with Britain a small and vulnerable
    nation isolated in the north Atlantic. In reality the
    United Kingdom was at that moment an imperial power with
    the collective might of Indian, African, Canadian and
    Australian manpower, resources and wealth at its disposal.

    It's also Poland passing a law so that errant historians,
    survivors or Auschwitz guides who raise the inconvenient
    fact of Polish complicity in atrocities now risk up to
    three years' imprisonment. It's Tennessee in the US
    legislating against the removal of Confederate statues
    when, as the former New Orleans mayor Mitch Landrieu puts
    it, they "purposefully celebrate a fictional, sanitised
    Confederacy; ignoring the death, ignoring the enslavement,
    and the terror that it actually stood for".

    On the other side are those who understand that historical
    narratives, monuments and statues are not some pristine
    record of history, but projects -- often created long after
    the event they remember -- that have weaponised history
    against specific groups. This is why South Africans
    question statues that glorified apartheid, why Native
    Americans protest against Thanksgiving, why indigenous
    Australians required a correction to the ludicrous ideas
    that Captain Cook "discovered" their continent or that they
    should celebrate the intrepid explorers who massacred their
    ancestors.

    The bronze statue of British colonialist Cecil John Rhodes
    is removed from the Cape Town University campus, South
    Africa. Photograph: Schalk van Zuydam/AP

    There are the New Yorkers who removed the statue of J
    Marion Sims, the gynaecologist who experimented on enslaved
    black women without anaesthetic; . . .

    Continues at:

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/29/britain-glorify-violent-past-defensive-empire-drug

    Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
    Om Shanti
    http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: www.darkrealms.ca (1:229/2)